<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: &quot;The Tudors&quot; to air on BBC2</title>
	<atom:link href="http://tudorhistory.org/blog/index.php/2007/04/16/the-tudors-to-air-on-bbc2/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://tudorhistory.org/blog/2007/04/16/the-tudors-to-air-on-bbc2/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 23:01:12 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://tudorhistory.org/blog/2007/04/16/the-tudors-to-air-on-bbc2/#comment-63</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Nov 2007 15:06:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tudorhistory.org/blog/2007/04/16/the-tudors-to-air-on-bbc2/#comment-63</guid>
		<description>Henry&#039;s sister Margaret NEVER married the King of Portugal or Charles Brandon she married  James V of Scotland &amp;  6th Earl of Angus. His younger sister Mary married Charles Brandon who was her 2nd husband her 1st  was the  King of France NOT Portugal. There must be so many people who watch a programme like the Tudors &amp; think it must be factual. Why though? I would have thought that there were plenty of interesting facts for a writer without making them up.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Henry&#8217;s sister Margaret NEVER married the King of Portugal or Charles Brandon she married  James V of Scotland &#038;  6th Earl of Angus. His younger sister Mary married Charles Brandon who was her 2nd husband her 1st  was the  King of France NOT Portugal. There must be so many people who watch a programme like the Tudors &#038; think it must be factual. Why though? I would have thought that there were plenty of interesting facts for a writer without making them up.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://tudorhistory.org/blog/2007/04/16/the-tudors-to-air-on-bbc2/#comment-62</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Oct 2007 17:20:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tudorhistory.org/blog/2007/04/16/the-tudors-to-air-on-bbc2/#comment-62</guid>
		<description>well if you dont like it DONT watch it !</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>well if you dont like it DONT watch it !</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://tudorhistory.org/blog/2007/04/16/the-tudors-to-air-on-bbc2/#comment-61</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Oct 2007 21:28:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tudorhistory.org/blog/2007/04/16/the-tudors-to-air-on-bbc2/#comment-61</guid>
		<description>Yes well, agree with both of you. Henry VIII was not a sexy, gorgeous monarch and was slim for a very short period in his life. He was certainly not some easy going loveable guy. As for the modern phrasing, it made me laugh my socks off.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes well, agree with both of you. Henry VIII was not a sexy, gorgeous monarch and was slim for a very short period in his life. He was certainly not some easy going loveable guy. As for the modern phrasing, it made me laugh my socks off.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://tudorhistory.org/blog/2007/04/16/the-tudors-to-air-on-bbc2/#comment-60</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Oct 2007 16:02:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tudorhistory.org/blog/2007/04/16/the-tudors-to-air-on-bbc2/#comment-60</guid>
		<description>had the misfortune to see the second episode last nite 12 Oct.  Wot a load of bollocks.  The women look like lap dancers!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>had the misfortune to see the second episode last nite 12 Oct.  Wot a load of bollocks.  The women look like lap dancers!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://tudorhistory.org/blog/2007/04/16/the-tudors-to-air-on-bbc2/#comment-59</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Oct 2007 21:11:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tudorhistory.org/blog/2007/04/16/the-tudors-to-air-on-bbc2/#comment-59</guid>
		<description>I have just seen episode 1. When I saw the Royal Hospital, Kilmainham, Dublin being used as location for the Ducal Palace in Urbino, I knew I was in for something dreadful. I was right.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;This bits where Wolsey and the French ambassador discuss an Anglo-French treaty are hilarious. Phrases like &quot;collective security&quot; and &quot;pan-European institutions&quot; !!!&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Whoever scripted this has no sense of history.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have just seen episode 1. When I saw the Royal Hospital, Kilmainham, Dublin being used as location for the Ducal Palace in Urbino, I knew I was in for something dreadful. I was right.</p>
<p>This bits where Wolsey and the French ambassador discuss an Anglo-French treaty are hilarious. Phrases like &#8220;collective security&#8221; and &#8220;pan-European institutions&#8221; !!!</p>
<p>Whoever scripted this has no sense of history.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.205 seconds -->

